Archive for the ‘Featured’ Category

Managing the Gray Lines of Reputation

Friday, January 16th, 2009

I was intrigued by the following post from Peter Kim’s Reputation Matters. At its core the post makes sense indicating that your online conduct, who you associate yourself with and how you engage in those relationships have a strong bearing on your credibility. I agree that your number of followers is not a correct measure of your credibility but the quality of the relationships you’ve built with your network.

The quote that caught my attention from Peter Kim’s post was: “Thus we require personal interactions to help bridge the trust gap. These consist of content and quality within direct conversation. Recency and frequency matter here which should temper the “monetary”/intangible risk of any action. Behavior bundles in here as well.” In a space where relationships have been traditionally built through honest and authentic interactions, this should ideally be the norm. But we have to realize that this space is changing everyday. Marketers are starting to see the true value of social media and the wealth of brand conversations and opportunities to engage with customers will set the ground for another wave of change.

This leads me to Peter’s response to sponsored posts in which he said, “I believe that monetization leads to loss of objectivity sooner or later.” He referenced David Charbuck’s post entitled “Shooting Fish: Blog Sluts”. I read David’s post and I think he has polarized the view of bloggers. It’s nice to idealize a world where writers/bloggers have integrity and do not, in any way, prostitute themselves for the almighty dollar. The reality is that it happens with the emergence of the blogs. Everyone has forever been trying to figure out the monetization of new media and inevitably 100 ideas will unfold and a handful will be tried. Writing used to be a profession, a craft that required strong skills that were honed overtime. Today’s reality is that everybody and his brother can easily create a blog and can, with the plethora of social tools, spread their own messages to the world. That being said, Social Media 101 has provided some rules about acceptable behaviour.

(more…)

Dan Aykroyd takes Crystal Head Viral

Friday, January 9th, 2009

Just last September we launched the Crystal Head Vodka site for Dan Aykroyd’s newest alcoholic endeavour. Released on the heels of the latest Indiana Jones movie, Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, and amidst the controversy about whether or not there will ever be a Ghostbusters 3 movie, the site was a hit.

Crystal Head Vodka officially reached viral status when a user posted, “Dan Aykroyd has lost his f***ing mind,” on Reddit.com. 301 comments were made almost immediately as viewers discussed the video, Dan Aykroyd, the vodka, and everything in between.

Titled simply Crystal Head Vodka, has been viewed 10,291 times.

And it doesn’t end there. Since then, besides being picked up by sites such as BoingBoing, Paste Magazine online, and NYMag, “the PC guy” of Mac vs PC fame posted a YouTube video with his initial tasting notes.

His comments include, “Remarkably smooth, very light with a glycerine-like finish… and a distinct nose of the paranormal”. Launched on Hallowe’en called “Crystal Head Vodka Tasting, this video garnered 30,089 views.

We’ll cheers to that!

Don’t forget your friends’ friends.

Tuesday, January 6th, 2009

I found a great article on New Scientist the other day by Michael Bond, How Your Friends’ Friend Affect YOur Mood

Here are some excerpts:

“Christakis … found that a person’s happiness is dependent not only on the happiness of an immediate friend but - to a lesser degree - on the happiness of their friend’s friend, and their friend’s friend’s friend. Furthermore, someone’s chances of being happy increase the better connected they are to happy people, and for that matter the better connected their friends and family.”

“Two factors appear crucial: the frequency of social contact, and the strength of the relationship. This is not too surprising: we know that emotional contagion requires physical proximity. It is also likely that the closer we feel to someone, the more empathetic we are towards them, and the more likely we are to catch their emotional state. However, how these two factors play out in day-to-day interactions is uncertain. What is also unclear - because it has never been properly tested - is the extent to which emotions can propagate through virtual networks, where the opportunity for physiological mimicry is much reduced.”

Networks of Influence: New Scientist

Networks of Influence: New Scientist

(more…)


Close
E-mail It